Chronic Wasting Disease Research at
the USGS-Wisconsin Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit
Scraping behavior as a potential
means of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) transmission
Michael
Spelman
Wildlife
Ecology 299 Final Project
What is a scrape?
A scrape is initiated by a
male scent-marking a low hanging branch, followed by pawing a shallow
depression into which they urinate. It
is used to establish dominance among males and to communicate with does (Miller
and Marchinton 1999). Additional behaviors
at scrapes include sniffing or licking the overhead branch and sniffing the
soil.
Why do we think scraping has the
potential to spread CWD?
CWD infection is higher in
male deer than in female deer (Miller and Conner 2005, Grear et al. 2006). Currently the reason for higher disease
prevalence is unknown, but hypotheses suggest that transmission among bucks may
be a possible mechanism.
There is the potential for CWD to be transmitted via the environment (Miller et
al. 2004).
Environmental transmission
could be via saliva, urine, and feces (Bollinger et al. 2004), among other
routes.
Scraping is an important
aspect of deer social interaction, especially for males. Scrape behavior involves activities that
bring deer in contact with urine, saliva, and possibly contaminated soil.
Scrapes could be an
important route of transmission that would account for the difference in
prevalence among different sexes and ages.
Hypotheses under investigation
H1: Multiple deer will interact with a scrape
site in ways that might spread CWD.

Fig. 1. The first picture
shows a buck urinating at a scrape. The
second picture shows a different buck interacting with the area where the first
buck urinated.
H2: Male deer will engage in more behaviors at
scrapes that could potentially spread CWD than females.

Fig. 2. A picture of a buck
and a doe visiting a scrape.
H3: Adult males will engage in more behaviors
that could potentially spread CWD than younger bucks.

Fig. 3. A picture of an
adult buck and a yearling buck visiting a scrape.
Study area
The study area was located
in the Sandhill Wildlife Demonstration Area (
Please note that CWD has not
been found in deer within the Sandhill area.
This location was chosen because it provided and ideal setting for
studying deer behavior.
More information about
Sandhill can be found at:
http://www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/land/wildlife/reclands/sandhill/index.htm
Methods
Scrape Behaviors
All photographs taken by the
cameras were reviewed for deer behavior at the scrape. The behaviors we were interested in were:
1. Branch Lick: Involved licking or
otherwise depositing saliva on the overhead branch
2. Mark Overhead Branch: A combination of licking and/or sniffing
along with antler rubbing
3. Pawing Ground: Pawing the soil under the
overhead branch
4. Sniff Branch: Sniffing the overhead
branch
5. Sniff Soil: Sniffing the ground that had been scraped or
its immediate vicinity
6. Urinate:
Urinating on the pawed ground or its immediate vicinity
(Click on the specific
behavior to watch a video clip example)
Behaviors were also grouped
based on whether they could potentially:
1. Deposit CWD into the environment (urination)
2. Expose a deer to CWD (sniff branch and sniff
soil)
3. Both deposit CWD and expose the deer (mark
overhead branch and branch lick)
4. Did not have the potential to deposit or
expose the deer to CWD (paw ground)
Results and discussion
H1: Multiple
deer will interact with a scrape site in ways that might spread CWD
Deer were observed engaging
in behaviors that have the potential to spread CWD (22 deposit interactions,
170 exposure interactions, and 88 that could potentially do both) and multiple
deer were recorded interacting with same scrape.
|
Number of bucks interacting with
different sites |
|
|||
|
Site |
Male
Fawns |
Male
Yearlings |
Male
Adults |
Total |
|
Site 1 -
Stovepipe |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
Site |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Site |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Site |
1 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
|
Site 5 - |
0 |
2 |
5 |
7 |
|
Site 6 -
NW-SW Border |
0 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
|
Site 7 -
North Bluff |
0 |
1 |
6 |
7 |
|
Site 8 -
SE Fence Line |
0 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
|
Site 9 -
G1 Flowage SE-SW |
1 |
2 |
13 |
16 |
|
Site |
0 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
|
Site 11 -
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Therefore, if environmental
contamination via saliva or urination are found to be important means of
transmission, then scraping behavior may be a potential mechanism for
transmission of CWD
H2: Male deer
will engage in more behaviors at scrapes that could potentially spread CWD than
females
We found that males visited
scrapes more frequently and spent more time at scrapes than females. There was also a difference in the frequency
with which behaviors were performed by males and females (Fig. 4), with males
engaging in all of the behaviors more often than females. Thus CWD infected males would have a higher
potential to deposit infectious prions into the environment, and susceptible
males would have a higher potential to expose themselves to CWD.

Fig. 4. Frequency of scrape behaviors for male,
female, and “antlerless” (fawns that could not be identified by sex) deer.
There was also a difference
in the relative frequency of behaviors performed by males and females and the
proportion of time spent on different behaviors (Figs. 5 and 6). Males were more likely to paw the ground or
mark overhead branches, while females were more likely to sniff the soil. Males were more likely to show scrape
behaviors that could both potentially deposit and expose individuals to
disease, thus providing the potential for transmission among males (which is
consistent with CWD prevalence data).
Fig. 5.
Distribution of scrape behaviors by males

Fig 6. Distribution
of scrape behaviors by females

We also evaluated how the
frequency of behaviors changed over the course of the breeding season (Fig.
7). Males interacted with the scrapes
more than females throughout the breeding season.

Fig. 7. Frequency of male and female behavior at
scrapes during the breeding season.
H3: Adult
males will engage in more behaviors that could potentially spread CWD than
younger bucks
We found that adult males
interacted more often with scrapes and spent more time visiting scrapes than
younger bucks (Fig. 8). Thus adult bucks
are more likely to both potentially expose themselves to CWD and potentially
deposit the prion into the environment.