Tips for Writing Proposals


Back to SIMBIOTA home page

CHOOSE THE FUNDING ORGANIZATION

One of the first steps in writing a grant proposal is to choose the organization (or organizations) to which you will submit the proposal. Some organizations support research, conservation or education in general, while others have more precise objectives. If your proposal fits the interest of a funding organization, then it has a better probability of being financed. Because proposal writing is a time and energy consuming process, it's important to be sure that your proposal is well written and is sent to an appropriate organization.


INITIAL CONTACT

Some organizations suggest that you send them a letter of inquiry before sending them a final proposal. This letter should include a brief summary of your proposal, indicating how your project fits the objectives of the organization and mentioning the approximate quantity of money that you will request. Other organizations, such as W.W.F., have field staff with whom one should consult in preparing the proposal. When possible, take the opportunity of communicating with funding organizations early in the writing process. Maintain active communication with them, contact them if you have questions or problems and NEVER fail to answer promptly.

If such communication is not possible, be sure to read the instructions for application carefully. Try to understand the objectives of the organization and any restrictions on the subject matter of the project and the types of expenses that can be covered.

Each organization has it own procedures and you must be sure to follow these when applying. Furthermore, these application guidelines may change from year to year. Therefore, after choosing an organization, be sure to obtain a current copy of the guidelines.


STYLE

In order to write a successful proposal, you must convince the reviewer of the importance and feasibility of your project. Reviewers in general have little time, and they may not be completely familiar with the type of project that you are proposing. For these reasons, your proposal should be concise. Write in a precise form, avoid philosophizing and using complex terms. Try not to be repetitive.


STRUCTURE OF THE PROPOSAL

A good proposal requires a good structure. If the granting organization specifies this structure, then follow this exactly. If the structure is not explicitly indicated then follow a general formula such as what we describe below.

1. INTRODUCTION.
In this section you should provide a statement of your objectives, the justification for the project and a review of the relevant literature. To convince a reviewer that your project is important, you must clearly and briefly describe your objectives: what is it that you want to do? Then you must justify those objectives: why is your work necessary?

If you are planning a research project, then it's important to review the literature related to the subject of your proposal and show how your work will address outstanding questions. Why is your study necessary given the work that has already been done? When the purpose of the project is to study a theory, then specify the hypothesis that you will test. Present the alternative hypotheses and be sure that they can be clearly distinguished using the methods you propose. If you are planning a conservation or education project, then describe the current situation and point out the specific problems that you hope to correct. Be brief and complete. This might sound contradictory, but it is possible if you restrict your literature review to themes directly related to the project.

2. METHODS.
In the description of your methods, you should convince the reviewer of the feasibility of the project and your ability to carry it out. Describe clearly and in detail the methods that you will follow in order to accomplish all your objectives (and only these objectives!). Make sure that all the steps for each procedure are described. There should be a clear correspondence between the METHODS and the objectives of your INTRODUCTION. Describe the methods in detail: what you will do and who will do it? In your proposal you will often provide more details about your methods than you do in any final publications. Don't be overly ambitious or optimistic; it's better to have methods that are modest but realistic than methods that might sound great but be impossible. This section is extremely important: be clear, precise and complete.

If your research objective is complex or the conservation/education problem is large, consider dividing your project into steps. In explaining your objectives, include a general, overall goal, summarize the steps for achieving that goal and then describe specifically your present objective within that framework. Be sure to clearly distinguish between the final goal of the overall project and the immediate goal of your proposal. If appropriate, show how your methods are flexible and can be adapted to problems that you are likely to encounter.

3. STUDY AREA.
If it's necessary to describe your study area, show the reviewer that you are familiar with this area or region. Describe clearly and briefly the aspects of the region that are related to your study. Also describe the facilities that will be available to you and how you plan to travel to and from the area.

4. WORK SCHEDULE.
Be sure that your schedule is complete and realistic. In doing this, you're demonstrating that you are familiar with the methods and techniques that you are proposing. Don't try to impress the reviewers with an overly ambitious schedule.

5. RESULTS AND EVALUATION.
Funding organizations usually require that you specify how you are going to analyze your results or evaluate the success of your proposal. If you're proposing a research project, the analysis of your data should be included in METHODS. Clearly indicate how your analysis will answer the questions that you raise in your objectives or how it will unequivocally identify the correct hypothesis from amongst the alternative hypotheses that you present.

If you are proposing an applied biology study, for example a study that will provide recommendations on land use to government agencies, specify what you plan to do with the results, how you will translate them into practical suggestions and how you will transmit them to people that can influence the outcome of relevant decisions. If you are proposing a program of conservation or education, explain how you will judge the success of your program. Few organizations will finance applied biology projects that do not have the possibility of influencing natural resource management decisions or whose effects are likely to be very brief.

6. BUDGET.
All the expenses included in your budget should be clearly justified by your METHODS section. First, mention all the equipment, services and other facilities that you will have access to without cost and describe the part of the project that will be funded by other sources besides that to which you are applying. Then list all the remaining costs for which you are requesting support in your proposal. Be detailed: specify which services, equipment or materials you are going to buy, how many units you will buy and what the cost per unit is. If possible, give the project's total budget and indicate which portion of that you are currently requesting. Finally, carefully check all your mathematics.

7. BACKGROUND OF THE APPLICANTS.
With this section, the reviewer can determine if the people involved in the project have the necessary qualifications for carrying it out. Usually, this information is summarized in the Curriculum Vitae of the principal investigator and collaborators. Besides trying to evaluate your level of experience, the reviewer is also interested in information on all the people that will be involved in the project, even if they are not co-authors of the project and are only mentioned in the METHODS section. The reviewer wants to be sure that you have evaluated your own abilities and have tried to compensate for any deficiencies by including other experts from inside or outside of your country.

8. SUMMARY (ABSTRACT).
If a summary is requested, it should contain a brief description of the most important points of your proposal. It should emphasize the objectives of the proposal and main points of the other sections. It should be written after you have finished the body of the proposal, be straightforward and do not use too much space trying to explain points. This is probably the first (and perhaps only) part of the proposal that the reviewer will read.

A FEW SUGGESTIONS

Once you have written a draft of the proposal, have others read it and criticize it. Have them read your summary first and see if, from that alone, they can understand the basics of your proposal. After they have read all of your proposal, ask them if they understand the importance of your work and the methods you will use. Make sure that you have followed the application instructions exactly. It is also very important that all the scientists and other experts who you claim are involved in the proposed project have actually reviewed the proposal, especially those parts that concern them. If possible, put the proposal aside for a little while; it helps to be able to read over the proposal with a bit of 'distance' from it. Later, after having received comments from your colleagues, go back and revise the manuscript. Incorporate the suggestions that you receive, and ask yourself if each sentence is really necessary and economical. Eliminate the superfluous. If possible, have somebody else read over your proposal again. If you are not writing in your native language, try to have a native speaker read over your manuscript. Although grammatical errors shouldn't reflect on the quality of the work you are proposing, you are in a competition and each error can hurt your chances.

You should demonstrate that you are on top of current scientific work related to the problem that you want to study. Read the recent issues of relevant, recognized journals such as The Journal of Wildlife Management, Ecology, Journal of Mammalogy, The Auk, Conservation Biology, Animal Behavior, etc. and look for studies that you can use as models for your work. If you don't have good access to literature, put yourself in contact with people who have recently written on themes related to your own, ask them for copies of their recent articles and for the names of other people from whom you can obtain more information. Ask to be on their mailing list for future reprints. Use whatever literature you do have available as a basis for expanding your literature collection. Some professional societies (see list below) publish directories of their members. These directories can help you contact authors whom you find cited.

Finally, don't count on receiving money before it is approved. The competition for grants is intense and only about 10% of all proposals are financed. Whether or not it is accepted, try to learn from each proposal. Mention in your cover letter that you want to receive the comments on your proposal. Often but not always, you'll have the opportunity to rewrite your proposal and resubmit it for a later deadline. Some criticisms of your proposal may seem unjustified but read them carefully and be sure that you consider them when you re-do your proposal. Don't be discouraged, many proposals are not accepted at first submission.


Back to SIMBIOTA home page